Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of The High Court considered the acquittal of respondents u/s 135(1)(ii) of the Customs Act. Dexamethasone is a dutiable item u/s Customs Tariff Act. Statements u/s 108 were valid. Prosecution initiated despite declaration of Dexamethasone. Adjudication proceedings confirmed evasion of duty. Respondents convicted for evasion. Confiscation ordered with redemption option. Respondents fined Rs. 50,000 each, no imprisonment due to redemption. The trial court's acquittal was overturned. Appeal of the department (Revenue) allowed.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
