Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of The High Court held that the petitioner cannot obtain relief against the provisional attachment order u/s PMLA. The court noted that the gold was released by the Customs Department based on authorization u/s SEZ Act before its suspension. The release of gold did not impact the Enforcement Directorate's proceedings to recover crime proceeds. The provisional order must be finalized within 180 days u/s 8 of the Act, with the deadline set for 27.07.2024. The petition was dismissed.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
