TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Functional comparability governs software-service benchmarking: dissimilar companies are excluded, while related-party filters, margins and working-ca...
The case involved denial of benefit u/s N/N. 32/97-Cus for...
CESTAT denies benefit of N/N. 32/97-Cus for imported goods. Duty demand not sustainable as goods were exported after job work. Confiscation order set aside.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
The case involved denial of benefit u/s N/N. 32/97-Cus for clearance of imported multi-color granite blocks due to not acquiring items free of cost. Commissioner (Appeals) directed duty recovery for goods imported via two Bills of Entry and ordered confiscation. Tribunal found goods were exported after job work, making appellant ineligible for the notification. As goods were exported, duty demand was unsustainable. Confiscation order was improper as goods were re-exported, following legal precedent. Tribunal set aside the order, restoring original authority's decision and allowing the appeal.
The case involved denial of benefit u/s N/N. 32/97-Cus for clearance of imported multi-color granite blocks due to not acquiring items free of cost. Commissioner (Appeals) directed duty recovery for goods imported via two Bills of Entry and ordered confiscation. Tribunal found goods were exported after job work, making appellant ineligible for the notification. As goods were exported, duty demand was unsustainable. Confiscation order was improper as goods were re-exported, following legal precedent. Tribunal set aside the order, restoring original authority's decision and allowing the appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4830 
Join Channel 
