Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
The case involves a dispute over the jurisdiction of the Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) to entertain an appeal u/s 142(9) of the CGST Act, 2017 regarding refund of CENVAT Credit. The Tribunal held that claims for refund must be processed according to existing laws, specifically Chapter V of the Finance Act and the Central Excise Act. The decision in Bosch Electrical applies to refunds u/s 142(9)(b), allowing appeals to be filed with the CESTAT. The matter is now to be decided by the appropriate Bench.
The case involves a dispute over the jurisdiction of the Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) to entertain an appeal u/s 142(9) of the CGST Act, 2017 regarding refund of CENVAT Credit. The Tribunal held that claims for refund must be processed according to existing laws, specifically Chapter V of the Finance Act and the Central Excise Act. The decision in Bosch Electrical applies to refunds u/s 142(9)(b), allowing appeals to be filed with the CESTAT. The matter is now to be decided by the appropriate Bench.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
