Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The Appellate Tribunal ruled on the validity of proceedings u/s Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 without a scheduled offence. It held that without a scheduled offence, charges of money laundering cannot be sustained. The appellant was acquitted of all scheduled offences, removing the basis for the money laundering charge. The provisional attachment order and confirming order were deemed invalid. Without a scheduled offence, there can be no "proceeds of crime." The appeal was disposed of in favor of the appellants.
The Appellate Tribunal ruled on the validity of proceedings u/s Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 without a scheduled offence. It held that without a scheduled offence, charges of money laundering cannot be sustained. The appellant was acquitted of all scheduled offences, removing the basis for the money laundering charge. The provisional attachment order and confirming order were deemed invalid. Without a scheduled offence, there can be no "proceeds of crime." The appeal was disposed of in favor of the appellants.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.