Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
The case involved wrongful utilization of CENVAT Credit for service tax liability under Reverse Charge Mechanism. The Tribunal held that utilizing CENVAT Credit for service tax on Reverse Charge Mechanism basis before 01.04.2011 is valid. The demand of Rs.14,36,72,226/- was set aside. However, the admissibility of CENVAT Credit on input services worth Rs.25,99,085/- was remanded for verification by the adjudicating authority. The impugned order was modified to set aside the service tax demand and remanded for verification. The adjudicating authority was instructed to decide the matter within three months. Appeal allowed in part and part matter remanded.
The case involved wrongful utilization of CENVAT Credit for service tax liability under Reverse Charge Mechanism. The Tribunal held that utilizing CENVAT Credit for service tax on Reverse Charge Mechanism basis before 01.04.2011 is valid. The demand of Rs.14,36,72,226/- was set aside. However, the admissibility of CENVAT Credit on input services worth Rs.25,99,085/- was remanded for verification by the adjudicating authority. The impugned order was modified to set aside the service tax demand and remanded for verification. The adjudicating authority was instructed to decide the matter within three months. Appeal allowed in part and part matter remanded.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
