Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The case involved wrongful utilization of CENVAT Credit for service tax liability under Reverse Charge Mechanism. The Tribunal held that utilizing CENVAT Credit for service tax on Reverse Charge Mechanism basis before 01.04.2011 is valid. The demand of Rs.14,36,72,226/- was set aside. However, the admissibility of CENVAT Credit on input services worth Rs.25,99,085/- was remanded for verification by the adjudicating authority. The impugned order was modified to set aside the service tax demand and remanded for verification. The adjudicating authority was instructed to decide the matter within three months. Appeal allowed in part and part matter remanded.
The case involved wrongful utilization of CENVAT Credit for service tax liability under Reverse Charge Mechanism. The Tribunal held that utilizing CENVAT Credit for service tax on Reverse Charge Mechanism basis before 01.04.2011 is valid. The demand of Rs.14,36,72,226/- was set aside. However, the admissibility of CENVAT Credit on input services worth Rs.25,99,085/- was remanded for verification by the adjudicating authority. The impugned order was modified to set aside the service tax demand and remanded for verification. The adjudicating authority was instructed to decide the matter within three months. Appeal allowed in part and part matter remanded.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
