Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
The ITAT Mumbai ruled on the reopening of assessment u/s 147 beyond four years and disallowance of deduction u/s 10(38) for alleged bogus LTCG. The Tribunal held that as the Assessee had fully disclosed material facts, the reopening was unjustified. Regarding addition u/s 68 for shares purchased off-market and later sold online, the Tribunal found no evidence of wrongdoing by the Assessee or the broker. The Assessee provided relevant documents and the AO did not question their authenticity. Citing a precedent, the Tribunal allowed the deduction u/s 10(38) as the shares were legitimately traded on the stock exchange. The decision favored the Assessee.
The ITAT Mumbai ruled on the reopening of assessment u/s 147 beyond four years and disallowance of deduction u/s 10(38) for alleged bogus LTCG. The Tribunal held that as the Assessee had fully disclosed material facts, the reopening was unjustified. Regarding addition u/s 68 for shares purchased off-market and later sold online, the Tribunal found no evidence of wrongdoing by the Assessee or the broker. The Assessee provided relevant documents and the AO did not question their authenticity. Citing a precedent, the Tribunal allowed the deduction u/s 10(38) as the shares were legitimately traded on the stock exchange. The decision favored the Assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
