<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Reopening of assessment u/s 147 beyond 4 years quashed. Addition u/s 68 not justified. Assessee provided documents to support claim.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78091</link>
    <description>The ITAT Mumbai ruled on the reopening of assessment u/s 147 beyond four years and disallowance of deduction u/s 10(38) for alleged bogus LTCG. The Tribunal held that as the Assessee had fully disclosed material facts, the reopening was unjustified. Regarding addition u/s 68 for shares purchased off-market and later sold online, the Tribunal found no evidence of wrongdoing by the Assessee or the broker. The Assessee provided relevant documents and the AO did not question their authenticity. Citing a precedent, the Tribunal allowed the deduction u/s 10(38) as the shares were legitimately traded on the stock exchange. The decision favored the Assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2024 08:03:58 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2024 08:03:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=755211" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Reopening of assessment u/s 147 beyond 4 years quashed. Addition u/s 68 not justified. Assessee provided documents to support claim.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78091</link>
      <description>The ITAT Mumbai ruled on the reopening of assessment u/s 147 beyond four years and disallowance of deduction u/s 10(38) for alleged bogus LTCG. The Tribunal held that as the Assessee had fully disclosed material facts, the reopening was unjustified. Regarding addition u/s 68 for shares purchased off-market and later sold online, the Tribunal found no evidence of wrongdoing by the Assessee or the broker. The Assessee provided relevant documents and the AO did not question their authenticity. Citing a precedent, the Tribunal allowed the deduction u/s 10(38) as the shares were legitimately traded on the stock exchange. The decision favored the Assessee.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2024 08:03:58 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78091</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>