Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
The ITAT Chennai addressed several issues. Firstly, regarding TDS u/s 195/192, it held that payments made to overseas group entities for relocation expenses of secondment employees were not subject to TDS as they were reimbursement of internal business costs, not taxable income. The matter was remitted to the AO for verification. Secondly, non-credit of DDT paid u/s 115O was remitted for verification of the amount paid. Thirdly, DDT liability u/s 115-O for dividends paid to a UK entity was to be decided by lower authorities. Lastly, lease rental payments were allowed as deductible expenses, with depreciation on assets taken on finance lease being part of the disallowance under section 32. The confusion created by the AO was clarified, and the Revenue's appeal on this issue was dismissed.
The ITAT Chennai addressed several issues. Firstly, regarding TDS u/s 195/192, it held that payments made to overseas group entities for relocation expenses of secondment employees were not subject to TDS as they were reimbursement of internal business costs, not taxable income. The matter was remitted to the AO for verification. Secondly, non-credit of DDT paid u/s 115O was remitted for verification of the amount paid. Thirdly, DDT liability u/s 115-O for dividends paid to a UK entity was to be decided by lower authorities. Lastly, lease rental payments were allowed as deductible expenses, with depreciation on assets taken on finance lease being part of the disallowance under section 32. The confusion created by the AO was clarified, and the Revenue's appeal on this issue was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
