Reimbursement payments to overseas group entities for employee relocation expenses not subject to TDS under sections 195/192

ITAT Chennai held that assessee's reimbursement payments to overseas group entities for employee relocation expenses were not subject to TDS under sections 195/192, as these were pure reimbursements without markup and not taxable income. The tribunal remanded TDS verification, DDT credit claims, and DDT liability issues to AO for fresh adjudication. Regarding lease rental payments, ITAT confirmed CIT(A)-NFAC's decision allowing depreciation deduction on finance lease assets, dismissing Revenue's appeal on this ground.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Disallowance of reimbursement of costs related to relocation of seconded employees without deduction of TDS u/s 195.
2. Non-credit of Dividend Distribution Tax (DDT) paid u/s 115O.
3. DDT liability under section 115O in respect of dividends declared/paid to a tax resident of the UK.
4. Allowance of lease rental payments and depreciation in financial lease transactions.

Summary:

Issue 1: Disallowance of Reimbursement of Costs Related to Relocation of Seconded Employees Without Deduction of TDS u/s 195
The first issue pertains to the disallowance of the assessee's payment of INR 2.59 Crores to its overseas group entities towards reimbursement of costs related to the relocation of its seconded employees without deduction of TDS u/s 195, invoking section 40(a)(i). The AO and CIT(A)-NFAC treated these payments as salary costs liable to TDS u/s 192. The Tribunal noted that the payments were purely reimbursements and not income in the hands of the assessee. The Tribunal remitted the issue back to the AO for verification of the nature of the payments and allowed the claim for statistical purposes.

Issue 2: Non-Credit of Dividend Distribution Tax (DDT) Paid u/s 115O
The second issue involves the non-credit of DDT paid to the extent of INR 28.1 Crores u/s 115O. The Tribunal directed the AO to verify the amount remitted within the prescribed timelines and allow the claim as per law. This issue was also remitted back to the AO for verification.

Issue 3: DDT Liability Under Section 115O in Respect of Dividends Declared/Paid to a Tax Resident of the UK
The third issue concerns the DDT liability of the assessee u/s 115O in respect of dividends declared/paid to Standard Chartered Bank, PLC, a tax resident of the UK. The Tribunal noted that this issue was not adjudicated by the lower authorities and remitted it back to the AO for a fresh decision after allowing a reasonable opportunity of being heard to the assessee.

Issue 4: Allowance of Lease Rental Payments and Depreciation in Financial Lease Transactions
The fourth issue in the Revenue's appeal pertains to the allowance of lease rental payments being financial lease and the allowance of depreciation. The AO disallowed the claim of deduction of INR 1,63,01,535/- on account of lease rental considered as revenue expenditure, treating it as a financial lease. The CIT(A)-NFAC allowed the claim of the assessee, relying on departmental circulars and court rulings. The Tribunal confirmed the order of the CIT(A)-NFAC, stating that the assessee is eligible for the claim of deduction in regard to depreciation on assets and dismissed the Revenue's appeal.

Conclusion:
The appeal filed by the assessee was allowed for statistical purposes, and the appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed.

---