Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Page of 4786
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 95715 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Delhi High Court examined the validity of a reassessment action u/s 148, focusing on the time limit for notice u/s 149 and computation of the "relevant assessment year." It was held that AY 2013-14 fell beyond the ten-year block period. The court emphasized the need to consider the statutory scheme for search assessments pre-Finance Act, 2021, and the date of material transmission to the jurisdictional AO for non-searched entities. The court rejected the reconstruction of the "relevant assessment year" point for non-searched persons and found the notice issued on 30 March 2023 to be beyond limitation, thus quashing it and any consequential actions.
The Delhi High Court examined the validity of a reassessment action u/s 148, focusing on the time limit for notice u/s 149 and computation of the "relevant assessment year." It was held that AY 2013-14 fell beyond the ten-year block period. The court emphasized the need to consider the statutory scheme for search assessments pre-Finance Act, 2021, and the date of material transmission to the jurisdictional AO for non-searched entities. The court rejected the reconstruction of the "relevant assessment year" point for non-searched persons and found the notice issued on 30 March 2023 to be beyond limitation, thus quashing it and any consequential actions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.