Mandatory textile export qualifiers distinguish flame-retardant fabrics from other listed fabrics for automated identification under the textiles ince...
Personal liberty safeguards restrict arrest after court-directed GST appearance, requiring interim release where authorities overreach pending proceed...
Alternative statutory remedy and delay bar GST writ challenges despite pending rectification, while distinct subject matter permits parallel proceedin...
The Delhi High Court examined the validity of a reassessment action u/s 148, focusing on the time limit for notice u/s 149 and computation of the "relevant assessment year." It was held that AY 2013-14 fell beyond the ten-year block period. The court emphasized the need to consider the statutory scheme for search assessments pre-Finance Act, 2021, and the date of material transmission to the jurisdictional AO for non-searched entities. The court rejected the reconstruction of the "relevant assessment year" point for non-searched persons and found the notice issued on 30 March 2023 to be beyond limitation, thus quashing it and any consequential actions.
The Delhi High Court examined the validity of a reassessment action u/s 148, focusing on the time limit for notice u/s 149 and computation of the "relevant assessment year." It was held that AY 2013-14 fell beyond the ten-year block period. The court emphasized the need to consider the statutory scheme for search assessments pre-Finance Act, 2021, and the date of material transmission to the jurisdictional AO for non-searched entities. The court rejected the reconstruction of the "relevant assessment year" point for non-searched persons and found the notice issued on 30 March 2023 to be beyond limitation, thus quashing it and any consequential actions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.