Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
The Delhi High Court examined the validity of a reassessment action u/s 148, focusing on the time limit for notice u/s 149 and computation of the "relevant assessment year." It was held that AY 2013-14 fell beyond the ten-year block period. The court emphasized the need to consider the statutory scheme for search assessments pre-Finance Act, 2021, and the date of material transmission to the jurisdictional AO for non-searched entities. The court rejected the reconstruction of the "relevant assessment year" point for non-searched persons and found the notice issued on 30 March 2023 to be beyond limitation, thus quashing it and any consequential actions.
The Delhi High Court examined the validity of a reassessment action u/s 148, focusing on the time limit for notice u/s 149 and computation of the "relevant assessment year." It was held that AY 2013-14 fell beyond the ten-year block period. The court emphasized the need to consider the statutory scheme for search assessments pre-Finance Act, 2021, and the date of material transmission to the jurisdictional AO for non-searched entities. The court rejected the reconstruction of the "relevant assessment year" point for non-searched persons and found the notice issued on 30 March 2023 to be beyond limitation, thus quashing it and any consequential actions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.