Authentication of paper assessment orders upheld, while qualifying repairs, consumables and vendor advance write-offs remain deductible business claim...
Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
The Supreme Court held that prosecution for violating Control Order requires contravention of the Order itself, not just terms of an agreement. Referring to R.M. Service Centre case, violation of Control Order is necessary for prosecution. Alleged violation of dealership agreement alone is insufficient. Allied Motors case on termination without notice doesn't apply. Issue was sample collection process, not procedural violations. Upheld R.M. Service Centre ruling. Respect for coordinate Bench decisions emphasized. Appeals allowed as termination based solely on agreement breach. All arguments considered, no other issues remain. Pending applications disposed of.
The Supreme Court held that prosecution for violating Control Order requires contravention of the Order itself, not just terms of an agreement. Referring to R.M. Service Centre case, violation of Control Order is necessary for prosecution. Alleged violation of dealership agreement alone is insufficient. Allied Motors case on termination without notice doesn't apply. Issue was sample collection process, not procedural violations. Upheld R.M. Service Centre ruling. Respect for coordinate Bench decisions emphasized. Appeals allowed as termination based solely on agreement breach. All arguments considered, no other issues remain. Pending applications disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.