Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
The Supreme Court held that prosecution for violating Control Order requires contravention of the Order itself, not just terms of an agreement. Referring to R.M. Service Centre case, violation of Control Order is necessary for prosecution. Alleged violation of dealership agreement alone is insufficient. Allied Motors case on termination without notice doesn't apply. Issue was sample collection process, not procedural violations. Upheld R.M. Service Centre ruling. Respect for coordinate Bench decisions emphasized. Appeals allowed as termination based solely on agreement breach. All arguments considered, no other issues remain. Pending applications disposed of.