Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
Income-tax exemption for specified regulatory fees and government grants applies subject to non-commercial activity and continuing compliance conditio...
Digital accessibility audit and remediation deadlines extended, while all other disability-compliance obligations for regulated entities remain unchan...
The Supreme Court held that prosecution for violating Control Order requires contravention of the Order itself, not just terms of an agreement. Referring to R.M. Service Centre case, violation of Control Order is necessary for prosecution. Alleged violation of dealership agreement alone is insufficient. Allied Motors case on termination without notice doesn't apply. Issue was sample collection process, not procedural violations. Upheld R.M. Service Centre ruling. Respect for coordinate Bench decisions emphasized. Appeals allowed as termination based solely on agreement breach. All arguments considered, no other issues remain. Pending applications disposed of.
The Supreme Court held that prosecution for violating Control Order requires contravention of the Order itself, not just terms of an agreement. Referring to R.M. Service Centre case, violation of Control Order is necessary for prosecution. Alleged violation of dealership agreement alone is insufficient. Allied Motors case on termination without notice doesn't apply. Issue was sample collection process, not procedural violations. Upheld R.M. Service Centre ruling. Respect for coordinate Bench decisions emphasized. Appeals allowed as termination based solely on agreement breach. All arguments considered, no other issues remain. Pending applications disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.