Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
Passenger baggage re-export requires true declaration and cannot be granted indirectly through discretionary redemption of undeclared prohibited goods...
The Supreme Court held that prosecution for violating Control Order requires contravention of the Order itself, not just terms of an agreement. Referring to R.M. Service Centre case, violation of Control Order is necessary for prosecution. Alleged violation of dealership agreement alone is insufficient. Allied Motors case on termination without notice doesn't apply. Issue was sample collection process, not procedural violations. Upheld R.M. Service Centre ruling. Respect for coordinate Bench decisions emphasized. Appeals allowed as termination based solely on agreement breach. All arguments considered, no other issues remain. Pending applications disposed of.
The Supreme Court held that prosecution for violating Control Order requires contravention of the Order itself, not just terms of an agreement. Referring to R.M. Service Centre case, violation of Control Order is necessary for prosecution. Alleged violation of dealership agreement alone is insufficient. Allied Motors case on termination without notice doesn't apply. Issue was sample collection process, not procedural violations. Upheld R.M. Service Centre ruling. Respect for coordinate Bench decisions emphasized. Appeals allowed as termination based solely on agreement breach. All arguments considered, no other issues remain. Pending applications disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
