Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
The High Court found a violation of natural justice as no opportunity for personal hearing was provided before passing an order u/s 73 of the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The impugned order did not consider the show-cause reply. The Court held that failure to grant a personal hearing was unacceptable. The Assessing Officer must consider the show-cause reply even if a personal hearing is not granted. The impugned order was set aside and remanded for a fresh decision with a date fixed for a personal hearing. The petition was disposed of by way of remand.
The High Court found a violation of natural justice as no opportunity for personal hearing was provided before passing an order u/s 73 of the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The impugned order did not consider the show-cause reply. The Court held that failure to grant a personal hearing was unacceptable. The Assessing Officer must consider the show-cause reply even if a personal hearing is not granted. The impugned order was set aside and remanded for a fresh decision with a date fixed for a personal hearing. The petition was disposed of by way of remand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
