Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
The High Court found a violation of natural justice as no opportunity for personal hearing was provided before passing an order u/s 73 of the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The impugned order did not consider the show-cause reply. The Court held that failure to grant a personal hearing was unacceptable. The Assessing Officer must consider the show-cause reply even if a personal hearing is not granted. The impugned order was set aside and remanded for a fresh decision with a date fixed for a personal hearing. The petition was disposed of by way of remand.
The High Court found a violation of natural justice as no opportunity for personal hearing was provided before passing an order u/s 73 of the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The impugned order did not consider the show-cause reply. The Court held that failure to grant a personal hearing was unacceptable. The Assessing Officer must consider the show-cause reply even if a personal hearing is not granted. The impugned order was set aside and remanded for a fresh decision with a date fixed for a personal hearing. The petition was disposed of by way of remand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
