Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
The ITAT Pune set aside an ex-parte order by the CIT(A) due to improper service of hearing notice. The CIT(A) dismissed the appeal in limine for non-prosecution without discussing the merits of TP adjustment. The tribunal held that CIT(A) should have addressed the appeal's substance even in ex-parte cases, citing a precedent. The matter was remitted to CIT(A) for fresh consideration in accordance with the law.
The ITAT Pune set aside an ex-parte order by the CIT(A) due to improper service of hearing notice. The CIT(A) dismissed the appeal in limine for non-prosecution without discussing the merits of TP adjustment. The tribunal held that CIT(A) should have addressed the appeal's substance even in ex-parte cases, citing a precedent. The matter was remitted to CIT(A) for fresh consideration in accordance with the law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.