Specialized Investment Fund distribution now requires dedicated certification, while transitional recognition preserves existing qualified distributor...
Overlapping GST proceedings require Central and State authorities to designate one competent authority for coordinated adjudication of the same matter...
Composite healthcare supplies retain exemption when patient care is the contract's essential character, despite payment through an implementing agency...
The ITAT Delhi ruled on an assessment u/s 153A, focusing on additions u/s 68 and undisclosed sources based on the Assessee's bank statement. The Tribunal found no incriminating material during the search to support the additions. Citing precedents like Kabul Chawla and Meeta Gutgutia, the Tribunal deleted the addition. The Supreme Court in Abhisar Build well P. Ltd. held that additions without incriminating material from a search or requisition are invalid. The Assessee's appeal was allowed.
The ITAT Delhi ruled on an assessment u/s 153A, focusing on additions u/s 68 and undisclosed sources based on the Assessee's bank statement. The Tribunal found no incriminating material during the search to support the additions. Citing precedents like Kabul Chawla and Meeta Gutgutia, the Tribunal deleted the addition. The Supreme Court in Abhisar Build well P. Ltd. held that additions without incriminating material from a search or requisition are invalid. The Assessee's appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.