Authentication of paper assessment orders upheld, while qualifying repairs, consumables and vendor advance write-offs remain deductible business claim...
Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
Necessary-party requirements limit impleadment of independent entities, while deferred consideration does not create an appealable adverse determinati...
The ITAT Delhi ruled on an assessment u/s 153A, focusing on additions u/s 68 and undisclosed sources based on the Assessee's bank statement. The Tribunal found no incriminating material during the search to support the additions. Citing precedents like Kabul Chawla and Meeta Gutgutia, the Tribunal deleted the addition. The Supreme Court in Abhisar Build well P. Ltd. held that additions without incriminating material from a search or requisition are invalid. The Assessee's appeal was allowed.
The ITAT Delhi ruled on an assessment u/s 153A, focusing on additions u/s 68 and undisclosed sources based on the Assessee's bank statement. The Tribunal found no incriminating material during the search to support the additions. Citing precedents like Kabul Chawla and Meeta Gutgutia, the Tribunal deleted the addition. The Supreme Court in Abhisar Build well P. Ltd. held that additions without incriminating material from a search or requisition are invalid. The Assessee's appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.