Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
Income-tax exemption for specified regulatory fees and government grants applies subject to non-commercial activity and continuing compliance conditio...
Digital accessibility audit and remediation deadlines extended, while all other disability-compliance obligations for regulated entities remain unchan...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
621 to 640 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT Delhi ruled on an assessment u/s 153A, focusing on additions u/s 68 and undisclosed sources based on the Assessee's bank statement. The Tribunal found no incriminating material during the search to support the additions. Citing precedents like Kabul Chawla and Meeta Gutgutia, the Tribunal deleted the addition. The Supreme Court in Abhisar Build well P. Ltd. held that additions without incriminating material from a search or requisition are invalid. The Assessee's appeal was allowed.
The ITAT Delhi ruled on an assessment u/s 153A, focusing on additions u/s 68 and undisclosed sources based on the Assessee's bank statement. The Tribunal found no incriminating material during the search to support the additions. Citing precedents like Kabul Chawla and Meeta Gutgutia, the Tribunal deleted the addition. The Supreme Court in Abhisar Build well P. Ltd. held that additions without incriminating material from a search or requisition are invalid. The Assessee's appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.