Purposive interpretation of residential house exemption: unregistered purchase agreement alone does not defeat relief, but investment must be verified...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3041 to 3060 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT Delhi ruled on an assessment u/s 153A, focusing on additions u/s 68 and undisclosed sources based on the Assessee's bank statement. The Tribunal found no incriminating material during the search to support the additions. Citing precedents like Kabul Chawla and Meeta Gutgutia, the Tribunal deleted the addition. The Supreme Court in Abhisar Build well P. Ltd. held that additions without incriminating material from a search or requisition are invalid. The Assessee's appeal was allowed.
The ITAT Delhi ruled on an assessment u/s 153A, focusing on additions u/s 68 and undisclosed sources based on the Assessee's bank statement. The Tribunal found no incriminating material during the search to support the additions. Citing precedents like Kabul Chawla and Meeta Gutgutia, the Tribunal deleted the addition. The Supreme Court in Abhisar Build well P. Ltd. held that additions without incriminating material from a search or requisition are invalid. The Assessee's appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.