Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
The ITAT Delhi held that denial of foreign tax credit u/s 90...
Foreign tax credit u/s 90 even if form 67 filed belatedly, is allowable subject to verification by the AO. Assessee entitled to claim relief as per DTAA.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
The ITAT Delhi held that denial of foreign tax credit u/s 90 solely for not filing Form 67 before original tax return u/s 139(1) is incorrect. Assessee can claim credit per DTAA even if Form 67 is filed with revised return. CIT (A) erred in not considering the claim before AO. Following Goetze (India) Ltd. case, claim is admitted for justice. Issue remitted to AO for consideration based on documents submitted. Assessee's appeal allowed for statistical purposes.
The ITAT Delhi held that denial of foreign tax credit u/s 90 solely for not filing Form 67 before original tax return u/s 139(1) is incorrect. Assessee can claim credit per DTAA even if Form 67 is filed with revised return. CIT (A) erred in not considering the claim before AO. Following Goetze (India) Ltd. case, claim is admitted for justice. Issue remitted to AO for consideration based on documents submitted. Assessee's appeal allowed for statistical purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
