Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
CESTAT Chennai addressed the demand of service tax on upfront charges for Extended Warranty Scheme (EWS) and used car scheme. Pre-01.07.2012, the tribunal held that demand u/s 65(105)(zo) for repair services cannot sustain as repair involves materials and service. Post-01.07.2012, EWS falls u/s 65B(44) & Section 66E(e) as creating an obligation, not actual repair. It's not Works Contract Service (WCS) but a declared service. Appellant acted in good faith, so penalties were set aside. The demand for the extended period was also set aside. Impugned order modified, appeals partly allowed.
CESTAT Chennai addressed the demand of service tax on upfront charges for Extended Warranty Scheme (EWS) and used car scheme. Pre-01.07.2012, the tribunal held that demand u/s 65(105)(zo) for repair services cannot sustain as repair involves materials and service. Post-01.07.2012, EWS falls u/s 65B(44) & Section 66E(e) as creating an obligation, not actual repair. It's not Works Contract Service (WCS) but a declared service. Appellant acted in good faith, so penalties were set aside. The demand for the extended period was also set aside. Impugned order modified, appeals partly allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
