Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The case involves attachment of immovable property jointly owned by appellant and brothers for government dues recovery. The attachment was done u/r 2(vi) of Rules of 1995 u/s 156 r/w. 142 of Customs Act, 1962. The property share is 20% appellant's and 80% brothers'. As partnership firm liability is joint u/s 25 of Indian Partnership Act, attaching entire property for firm's dues is improper. Interest u/s 11AB of Central Excise Act, 1944 not applicable pre-enactment. As dues paid, property attachment set aside, appeal allowed.
The case involves attachment of immovable property jointly owned by appellant and brothers for government dues recovery. The attachment was done u/r 2(vi) of Rules of 1995 u/s 156 r/w. 142 of Customs Act, 1962. The property share is 20% appellant's and 80% brothers'. As partnership firm liability is joint u/s 25 of Indian Partnership Act, attaching entire property for firm's dues is improper. Interest u/s 11AB of Central Excise Act, 1944 not applicable pre-enactment. As dues paid, property attachment set aside, appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
