Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Page of 4786
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
61 to 80 of 95714 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Delhi High Court reviewed a case involving a violation of principles of natural justice in relation to an order issued under section 73 of the CGST Act, 2017. The court found the impugned order to be invalid as it failed to consider the detailed replies and supporting documents submitted by the Petitioner. The Proper Officer did not assess the reply on its merits and did not seek further clarification or documents from the Petitioner. Consequently, the court set aside the impugned order dated 29.04.2024, ruling it as unsustainable. The petition was disposed of in favor of the Petitioner.
The Delhi High Court reviewed a case involving a violation of principles of natural justice in relation to an order issued under section 73 of the CGST Act, 2017. The court found the impugned order to be invalid as it failed to consider the detailed replies and supporting documents submitted by the Petitioner. The Proper Officer did not assess the reply on its merits and did not seek further clarification or documents from the Petitioner. Consequently, the court set aside the impugned order dated 29.04.2024, ruling it as unsustainable. The petition was disposed of in favor of the Petitioner.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
