Authentication of paper assessment orders upheld, while qualifying repairs, consumables and vendor advance write-offs remain deductible business claim...
Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Page of 4782
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
301 to 320 of 95636 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
CESTAT Bangalore held that goods of foreign origin imported for repairs and return are eligible for exemption under the Notification No.153/1994. The appellant imported aircraft parts for repairing aircraft engines, stating spare parts would be used for repairs and exported. The Tribunal found the spare parts imported for repair/replacement of engines were exempt u/s Notification No.21/2002-Cus., even if cleared for home consumption. As goods were bonded, repaired, and exported, appellant qualified for Notification No.153/1994 benefit. The impugned order was set aside, and appeals allowed.
CESTAT Bangalore held that goods of foreign origin imported for repairs and return are eligible for exemption under the Notification No.153/1994. The appellant imported aircraft parts for repairing aircraft engines, stating spare parts would be used for repairs and exported. The Tribunal found the spare parts imported for repair/replacement of engines were exempt u/s Notification No.21/2002-Cus., even if cleared for home consumption. As goods were bonded, repaired, and exported, appellant qualified for Notification No.153/1994 benefit. The impugned order was set aside, and appeals allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.