Aircraft spare parts qualify for duty exemption under Notification 153/1994 when used for engine repairs and re-export

CESTAT Bangalore ruled in favor of appellant regarding exemption eligibility under Notification No.153/1994 for imported aircraft spare parts used in engine repairs. The tribunal held that the notification covers goods of foreign origin imported for repairs and return, not limited to goods themselves requiring repair. Since spare parts were bonded, used for repairing engines, and subsequently exported, appellant qualified for duty exemption. The original authority's restrictive interpretation was rejected, and the impugned order was set aside with appeals allowed.

---

---

Issues involved: Interpretation of Notification No.153/1994 dated 13.07.1994 for exemption of goods of foreign origin imported for repairs and return; eligibility for benefit of Notification No.21/2002-Cus. dated 01.03.2002 for spare parts of aeroplanes under specific conditions.

Summary:
The case involved M/s. Varman Aviation Pvt. Ltd. engaged in repair/overhauling of imported aero engines, importing spare parts under bond for repair/overhaul, and claiming duty exemption under Notification No.153/1994. The Original Authority denied benefit citing spare parts not meant for repair as per Notification conditions. The Commissioner (A) upheld the decision, rejecting alternative remedy under Notification No.134/1994 and benefit under Notification No.21/2002.

The appellant argued spare parts were used for repair, exported engines incorporated these parts, and no duty was payable on re-export under Section 69 of the Customs Act, 1962. They claimed eligibility under Notification No.153/1994 for spare parts essential for repairs, supported by legal precedents.

The Revenue's Authorized Representative contended the appellant's refusal to obtain Section 65 bond hindered domestic repair services, and the appellant's requests led to inclusion of Section 65 bond. They opposed benefit under Notification No.134/1994 and No.21/2002 for home consumption.

The Tribunal analyzed Notification No.153/1994 exempting goods imported for repairs and return, finding spare parts used in engines for export satisfied conditions. They also examined Notification No.21/2002 exempting spare parts for aircraft under specific conditions, concluding the appellant was eligible for both exemptions.

In conclusion, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeals were allowed with any consequential relief as per law.

---