Bona fide disclosure requirements govern under-reporting penalties, and post-penalty immunity applications cannot secure available statutory protectio...
Certificate-of-origin verification procedure governs preferential customs benefits; denial without retroactive verification was set aside with consequ...
Disciplinary Committee jurisdiction and mandatory investigation requirements invalidated cancellation of an insolvency professional's registration and...
Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Page of 4788
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
881 to 900 of 95752 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The High Court rejected the appeal filed by the applicant due to lack of reasons for enhancing turnover, non-consideration of material evidence, and failure to obtain Form 31 from Trade Tax Department. The Court upheld the decision to restore the assessment by the Assessing Authority, citing documentary evidence of sales on credit. The Tribunal considered all evidence, including survey slips, and found the applicant evaded tax. The Court dismissed the appeal for recall, noting lack of appearance by the applicant's counsel. No extraneous considerations were found. The Court cited legal precedent limiting its interference to questions of law. The revision was dismissed for lacking merit.
The High Court rejected the appeal filed by the applicant due to lack of reasons for enhancing turnover, non-consideration of material evidence, and failure to obtain Form 31 from Trade Tax Department. The Court upheld the decision to restore the assessment by the Assessing Authority, citing documentary evidence of sales on credit. The Tribunal considered all evidence, including survey slips, and found the applicant evaded tax. The Court dismissed the appeal for recall, noting lack of appearance by the applicant's counsel. No extraneous considerations were found. The Court cited legal precedent limiting its interference to questions of law. The revision was dismissed for lacking merit.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
