<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Appeal on the ground of lack of reasons for enhancing turnover, non-consideration of evidence, and extraneous considerations, got rejected.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77899</link>
    <description>The High Court rejected the appeal filed by the applicant due to lack of reasons for enhancing turnover, non-consideration of material evidence, and failure to obtain Form 31 from Trade Tax Department. The Court upheld the decision to restore the assessment by the Assessing Authority, citing documentary evidence of sales on credit. The Tribunal considered all evidence, including survey slips, and found the applicant evaded tax. The Court dismissed the appeal for recall, noting lack of appearance by the applicant&#039;s counsel. No extraneous considerations were found. The Court cited legal precedent limiting its interference to questions of law. The revision was dismissed for lacking merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2024 08:30:14 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 May 2024 08:30:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=754566" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Appeal on the ground of lack of reasons for enhancing turnover, non-consideration of evidence, and extraneous considerations, got rejected.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77899</link>
      <description>The High Court rejected the appeal filed by the applicant due to lack of reasons for enhancing turnover, non-consideration of material evidence, and failure to obtain Form 31 from Trade Tax Department. The Court upheld the decision to restore the assessment by the Assessing Authority, citing documentary evidence of sales on credit. The Tribunal considered all evidence, including survey slips, and found the applicant evaded tax. The Court dismissed the appeal for recall, noting lack of appearance by the applicant&#039;s counsel. No extraneous considerations were found. The Court cited legal precedent limiting its interference to questions of law. The revision was dismissed for lacking merit.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2024 08:30:14 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77899</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>