Tax exemption for regulatory authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return filing...
Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Page of 4782
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
261 to 280 of 95633 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The High Court rejected the appeal filed by the applicant due to lack of reasons for enhancing turnover, non-consideration of material evidence, and failure to obtain Form 31 from Trade Tax Department. The Court upheld the decision to restore the assessment by the Assessing Authority, citing documentary evidence of sales on credit. The Tribunal considered all evidence, including survey slips, and found the applicant evaded tax. The Court dismissed the appeal for recall, noting lack of appearance by the applicant's counsel. No extraneous considerations were found. The Court cited legal precedent limiting its interference to questions of law. The revision was dismissed for lacking merit.
The High Court rejected the appeal filed by the applicant due to lack of reasons for enhancing turnover, non-consideration of material evidence, and failure to obtain Form 31 from Trade Tax Department. The Court upheld the decision to restore the assessment by the Assessing Authority, citing documentary evidence of sales on credit. The Tribunal considered all evidence, including survey slips, and found the applicant evaded tax. The Court dismissed the appeal for recall, noting lack of appearance by the applicant's counsel. No extraneous considerations were found. The Court cited legal precedent limiting its interference to questions of law. The revision was dismissed for lacking merit.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
