Authentication of paper assessment orders upheld, while qualifying repairs, consumables and vendor advance write-offs remain deductible business claim...
Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
The ITAT Surat held that disallowance of business loss on sale of securities as LTCG in penny stocks was unjustified. The AO failed to provide evidence of collusive transactions or falsity in the assessee's documents. Relying on SHAILESH S. SHAH, suspicion alone cannot warrant additions. Default by the broker does not prove wrongdoing; other evidence like purchase details, source explanation, STT payment, and banking transactions must be considered. Without concrete evidence, no disallowance can be made. The addition by AO was deleted, and the assessee's appeal was allowed.
The ITAT Surat held that disallowance of business loss on sale of securities as LTCG in penny stocks was unjustified. The AO failed to provide evidence of collusive transactions or falsity in the assessee's documents. Relying on SHAILESH S. SHAH, suspicion alone cannot warrant additions. Default by the broker does not prove wrongdoing; other evidence like purchase details, source explanation, STT payment, and banking transactions must be considered. Without concrete evidence, no disallowance can be made. The addition by AO was deleted, and the assessee's appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4784
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
