Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of The ITAT Surat held that disallowance of business loss on sale of securities as LTCG in penny stocks was unjustified. The AO failed to provide evidence of collusive transactions or falsity in the assessee's documents. Relying on SHAILESH S. SHAH, suspicion alone cannot warrant additions. Default by the broker does not prove wrongdoing; other evidence like purchase details, source explanation, STT payment, and banking transactions must be considered. Without concrete evidence, no disallowance can be made. The addition by AO was deleted, and the assessee's appeal was allowed.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
