Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
The ITAT Surat held that disallowance of business loss on sale of securities as LTCG in penny stocks was unjustified. The AO failed to provide evidence of collusive transactions or falsity in the assessee's documents. Relying on SHAILESH S. SHAH, suspicion alone cannot warrant additions. Default by the broker does not prove wrongdoing; other evidence like purchase details, source explanation, STT payment, and banking transactions must be considered. Without concrete evidence, no disallowance can be made. The addition by AO was deleted, and the assessee's appeal was allowed.
The ITAT Surat held that disallowance of business loss on sale of securities as LTCG in penny stocks was unjustified. The AO failed to provide evidence of collusive transactions or falsity in the assessee's documents. Relying on SHAILESH S. SHAH, suspicion alone cannot warrant additions. Default by the broker does not prove wrongdoing; other evidence like purchase details, source explanation, STT payment, and banking transactions must be considered. Without concrete evidence, no disallowance can be made. The addition by AO was deleted, and the assessee's appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.