Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
The ITAT Chennai held that the denial of registration u/s 80G(5) to an old trust was unjustified as the trust existed before the new registration regime. The trust mistakenly applied u/s 80G(5)(iv) instead of u/s 80G(5)(i), receiving provisional approval for 3 years. The trust's subsequent application u/s 80G(5)(iii) was rejected for violating timelines. Referring to a precedent, the ITAT directed authorities to consider the trust's application u/s 80G(5)(i) within the extended deadline and make a decision within six months.
The ITAT Chennai held that the denial of registration u/s 80G(5) to an old trust was unjustified as the trust existed before the new registration regime. The trust mistakenly applied u/s 80G(5)(iv) instead of u/s 80G(5)(i), receiving provisional approval for 3 years. The trust's subsequent application u/s 80G(5)(iii) was rejected for violating timelines. Referring to a precedent, the ITAT directed authorities to consider the trust's application u/s 80G(5)(i) within the extended deadline and make a decision within six months.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
