https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77844 The ITAT Chennai held that the denial of registration u/s 80G(5) to an old trust was unjustified as the trust existed before the new registration regime. The trust mistakenly applied u/s 80G(5)(iv) instead of u/s 80G(5)(i), receiving provisional approval for 3 years. The trust's subsequent application u/s 80G(5)(iii) was rejected for violating timelines. Referring to a precedent, the ITAT directed authorities to consider the trust's application u/s 80G(5)(i) within the extended deadline and make a decision within six months. en-us Mon, 27 May 2024 08:07:25 +0530 Mon, 27 May 2024 08:07:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77844 The ITAT Chennai held that the denial of registration u/s 80G(5) to an old trust was unjustified as the trust existed before the new registration regime. The trust mistakenly applied u/s 80G(5)(iv) instead of u/s 80G(5)(i), receiving provisional approval for 3 years. The trust's subsequent application u/s 80G(5)(iii) was rejected for violating timelines. Referring to a precedent, the ITAT directed authorities to consider the trust's application u/s 80G(5)(i) within the extended deadline and make a decision within six months. Highlights Income Tax Mon, 27 May 2024 08:07:25 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77844