Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
The ITAT Chennai held that the denial of registration u/s 80G(5) to an old trust was unjustified as the trust existed before the new registration regime. The trust mistakenly applied u/s 80G(5)(iv) instead of u/s 80G(5)(i), receiving provisional approval for 3 years. The trust's subsequent application u/s 80G(5)(iii) was rejected for violating timelines. Referring to a precedent, the ITAT directed authorities to consider the trust's application u/s 80G(5)(i) within the extended deadline and make a decision within six months.
The ITAT Chennai held that the denial of registration u/s 80G(5) to an old trust was unjustified as the trust existed before the new registration regime. The trust mistakenly applied u/s 80G(5)(iv) instead of u/s 80G(5)(i), receiving provisional approval for 3 years. The trust's subsequent application u/s 80G(5)(iii) was rejected for violating timelines. Referring to a precedent, the ITAT directed authorities to consider the trust's application u/s 80G(5)(i) within the extended deadline and make a decision within six months.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4784
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
