Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Addition made u/s. 69/69B - difference between the stamp duty value and the sale consideration with respect to purchase of property - family settlement to constitute "transfer" or not - The Tribunal found that the addition under section 69 was incorrect as the investment was recorded in the books. For section 69B, the AO failed to provide evidence that the assessee expended more than recorded. The Tribunal also noted that section 56(2)(vii)(b) was not applicable to companies and section 56(2)(x) was effective from AY 2017-18. The Tribunal concluded that the transaction under family settlement did not amount to a "transfer" and deleted the addition.
Addition made u/s. 69/69B - difference between the stamp duty value and the sale consideration with respect to purchase of property - family settlement to constitute "transfer" or not - The Tribunal found that the addition under section 69 was incorrect as the investment was recorded in the books. For section 69B, the AO failed to provide evidence that the assessee expended more than recorded. The Tribunal also noted that section 56(2)(vii)(b) was not applicable to companies and section 56(2)(x) was effective from AY 2017-18. The Tribunal concluded that the transaction under family settlement did not amount to a "transfer" and deleted the addition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4807 
Join Channel 
