<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tribunal Rules Against Incorrect Additions in Property Purchase; Clarifies Applicability of Tax Sections on Family Settlements.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77560</link>
    <description>Addition made u/s. 69/69B - difference between the stamp duty value and the sale consideration with respect to purchase of property - family settlement to constitute &quot;transfer&quot; or not - The Tribunal found that the addition under section 69 was incorrect as the investment was recorded in the books. For section 69B, the AO failed to provide evidence that the assessee expended more than recorded. The Tribunal also noted that section 56(2)(vii)(b) was not applicable to companies and section 56(2)(x) was effective from AY 2017-18. The Tribunal concluded that the transaction under family settlement did not amount to a &quot;transfer&quot; and deleted the addition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2024 08:32:22 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2024 08:32:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=753634" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tribunal Rules Against Incorrect Additions in Property Purchase; Clarifies Applicability of Tax Sections on Family Settlements.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77560</link>
      <description>Addition made u/s. 69/69B - difference between the stamp duty value and the sale consideration with respect to purchase of property - family settlement to constitute &quot;transfer&quot; or not - The Tribunal found that the addition under section 69 was incorrect as the investment was recorded in the books. For section 69B, the AO failed to provide evidence that the assessee expended more than recorded. The Tribunal also noted that section 56(2)(vii)(b) was not applicable to companies and section 56(2)(x) was effective from AY 2017-18. The Tribunal concluded that the transaction under family settlement did not amount to a &quot;transfer&quot; and deleted the addition.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2024 08:32:22 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77560</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>