Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
381 to 400 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Addition made u/s. 69/69B - difference between the stamp duty value and the sale consideration with respect to purchase of property - family settlement to constitute "transfer" or not - The Tribunal found that the addition under section 69 was incorrect as the investment was recorded in the books. For section 69B, the AO failed to provide evidence that the assessee expended more than recorded. The Tribunal also noted that section 56(2)(vii)(b) was not applicable to companies and section 56(2)(x) was effective from AY 2017-18. The Tribunal concluded that the transaction under family settlement did not amount to a "transfer" and deleted the addition.
Addition made u/s. 69/69B - difference between the stamp duty value and the sale consideration with respect to purchase of property - family settlement to constitute "transfer" or not - The Tribunal found that the addition under section 69 was incorrect as the investment was recorded in the books. For section 69B, the AO failed to provide evidence that the assessee expended more than recorded. The Tribunal also noted that section 56(2)(vii)(b) was not applicable to companies and section 56(2)(x) was effective from AY 2017-18. The Tribunal concluded that the transaction under family settlement did not amount to a "transfer" and deleted the addition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
