Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Valuation of export goods - Iron Ore Fines - transaction value - FOB price - Export duty - The appellant contested this, arguing that unless the Revenue disputes the transaction value with corroborative evidence, it should be considered valid, citing relevant case laws. The Tribunal concurred, emphasizing that the Revenue had not doubted the transaction value and had not followed sequential valuation rules before adopting contemporaneous values. As the Revenue did not contest the Adjudicating Authority's findings, the transaction value's correctness was upheld, and the appeal was allowed.
Valuation of export goods - Iron Ore Fines - transaction value - FOB price - Export duty - The appellant contested this, arguing that unless the Revenue disputes the transaction value with corroborative evidence, it should be considered valid, citing relevant case laws. The Tribunal concurred, emphasizing that the Revenue had not doubted the transaction value and had not followed sequential valuation rules before adopting contemporaneous values. As the Revenue did not contest the Adjudicating Authority's findings, the transaction value's correctness was upheld, and the appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
