<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Iron Ore Export Valuation Dispute Resolved as Tribunal Upholds Transaction Value Due to Lack of Revenue Evidence.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77517</link>
    <description>Valuation of export goods - Iron Ore Fines - transaction value - FOB price - Export duty - The appellant contested this, arguing that unless the Revenue disputes the transaction value with corroborative evidence, it should be considered valid, citing relevant case laws. The Tribunal concurred, emphasizing that the Revenue had not doubted the transaction value and had not followed sequential valuation rules before adopting contemporaneous values. As the Revenue did not contest the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s findings, the transaction value&#039;s correctness was upheld, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2024 12:28:49 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2024 12:28:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=753461" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Iron Ore Export Valuation Dispute Resolved as Tribunal Upholds Transaction Value Due to Lack of Revenue Evidence.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77517</link>
      <description>Valuation of export goods - Iron Ore Fines - transaction value - FOB price - Export duty - The appellant contested this, arguing that unless the Revenue disputes the transaction value with corroborative evidence, it should be considered valid, citing relevant case laws. The Tribunal concurred, emphasizing that the Revenue had not doubted the transaction value and had not followed sequential valuation rules before adopting contemporaneous values. As the Revenue did not contest the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s findings, the transaction value&#039;s correctness was upheld, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2024 12:28:49 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77517</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>