Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Condonation of delay in filing of revised return of income - CBDT rejecting petitioner’s application u/s 119 - Acceptance of Recast Financials - The High Court criticized the CBDT for its refusal to accept the recast financial statements, noting that the non-acceptance was contrary to the principles of genuine hardship. The court highlighted that the petitioner's hardships were genuine and disregarded by the CBDT without substantial justification. - The court affirmed that the recasting of books under the Companies Act, mandated by the NCLT, should influence tax proceedings, contradicting the CBDT's stance that these are separate realms. - The HC directed the tax authorities to allow the filing of revised returns based on the recast financial statements and proceed accordingly.
Condonation of delay in filing of revised return of income - CBDT rejecting petitioner’s application u/s 119 - Acceptance of Recast Financials - The High Court criticized the CBDT for its refusal to accept the recast financial statements, noting that the non-acceptance was contrary to the principles of genuine hardship. The court highlighted that the petitioner's hardships were genuine and disregarded by the CBDT without substantial justification. - The court affirmed that the recasting of books under the Companies Act, mandated by the NCLT, should influence tax proceedings, contradicting the CBDT's stance that these are separate realms. - The HC directed the tax authorities to allow the filing of revised returns based on the recast financial statements and proceed accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
