<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Rebukes Tax Board for Denying Revised Tax Return Filing Due to Delay; Emphasizes Impact of Recast Financials.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77329</link>
    <description>Condonation of delay in filing of revised return of income - CBDT rejecting petitioner’s application u/s 119 - Acceptance of Recast Financials - The High Court criticized the CBDT for its refusal to accept the recast financial statements, noting that the non-acceptance was contrary to the principles of genuine hardship. The court highlighted that the petitioner&#039;s hardships were genuine and disregarded by the CBDT without substantial justification. - The court affirmed that the recasting of books under the Companies Act, mandated by the NCLT, should influence tax proceedings, contradicting the CBDT&#039;s stance that these are separate realms. - The HC directed the tax authorities to allow the filing of revised returns based on the recast financial statements and proceed accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2024 11:13:18 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 May 2024 11:13:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=752721" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Rebukes Tax Board for Denying Revised Tax Return Filing Due to Delay; Emphasizes Impact of Recast Financials.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77329</link>
      <description>Condonation of delay in filing of revised return of income - CBDT rejecting petitioner’s application u/s 119 - Acceptance of Recast Financials - The High Court criticized the CBDT for its refusal to accept the recast financial statements, noting that the non-acceptance was contrary to the principles of genuine hardship. The court highlighted that the petitioner&#039;s hardships were genuine and disregarded by the CBDT without substantial justification. - The court affirmed that the recasting of books under the Companies Act, mandated by the NCLT, should influence tax proceedings, contradicting the CBDT&#039;s stance that these are separate realms. - The HC directed the tax authorities to allow the filing of revised returns based on the recast financial statements and proceed accordingly.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2024 11:13:18 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77329</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>