Charitable trust income application permits verified capital expenditure but rejects deferred pre-operative claims and requires reconsideration of con...
Reinsurance premium deductions require established regulatory breaches, while independently acquired software qualifies within the computer depreciati...
Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Violation of principles of natural justice - notice u/s 46 was not been given to the petitioner - The Court rejects the petitioner's contention regarding non-compliance with Section 46. Since the petitioner filed a NIL return, no notice was necessary under this section. The case falls under Chapter XIV, where notices were issued under Section 70 post-search and seizure. - The Court finds no violation of principles of natural justice. The petitioner was provided with opportunities for a personal hearing, as mandated by Section 75(5) of the Act. The petitioner's admission of GST liability in evidence strengthens this finding. - Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed, with the petitioner directed to pursue appellate remedies.
Violation of principles of natural justice - notice u/s 46 was not been given to the petitioner - The Court rejects the petitioner's contention regarding non-compliance with Section 46. Since the petitioner filed a NIL return, no notice was necessary under this section. The case falls under Chapter XIV, where notices were issued under Section 70 post-search and seizure. - The Court finds no violation of principles of natural justice. The petitioner was provided with opportunities for a personal hearing, as mandated by Section 75(5) of the Act. The petitioner's admission of GST liability in evidence strengthens this finding. - Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed, with the petitioner directed to pursue appellate remedies.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4807 
Join Channel 
