<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Dismisses Claim of Natural Justice Violation Due to NIL Return Filing; Advises Appellate Remedies.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77189</link>
    <description>Violation of principles of natural justice - notice u/s 46 was not been given to the petitioner - The Court rejects the petitioner&#039;s contention regarding non-compliance with Section 46. Since the petitioner filed a NIL return, no notice was necessary under this section. The case falls under Chapter XIV, where notices were issued under Section 70 post-search and seizure. - The Court finds no violation of principles of natural justice. The petitioner was provided with opportunities for a personal hearing, as mandated by Section 75(5) of the Act. The petitioner&#039;s admission of GST liability in evidence strengthens this finding. - Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed, with the petitioner directed to pursue appellate remedies.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2024 18:19:07 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 May 2024 18:19:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=752224" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Dismisses Claim of Natural Justice Violation Due to NIL Return Filing; Advises Appellate Remedies.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77189</link>
      <description>Violation of principles of natural justice - notice u/s 46 was not been given to the petitioner - The Court rejects the petitioner&#039;s contention regarding non-compliance with Section 46. Since the petitioner filed a NIL return, no notice was necessary under this section. The case falls under Chapter XIV, where notices were issued under Section 70 post-search and seizure. - The Court finds no violation of principles of natural justice. The petitioner was provided with opportunities for a personal hearing, as mandated by Section 75(5) of the Act. The petitioner&#039;s admission of GST liability in evidence strengthens this finding. - Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed, with the petitioner directed to pursue appellate remedies.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2024 18:19:07 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77189</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>