Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1381 to 1400 of 96177 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Validity of assessment order - Disparity in Returns - The High Court examined the case thoroughly. It noted that the entire tax liability stemmed from the disparity between the petitioner's GSTR 3B return and the auto-populated GSTR 2A return. Considering Circular No.183, which required obtaining a certificate from the supplier, the Court acknowledged that the petitioner eventually obtained the certificate, albeit belatedly. - The High Court, considering the submissions and evidence presented, set aside the impugned order and directed the respondent to provide the petitioner with a fair opportunity to address the tax demand.
Validity of assessment order - Disparity in Returns - The High Court examined the case thoroughly. It noted that the entire tax liability stemmed from the disparity between the petitioner's GSTR 3B return and the auto-populated GSTR 2A return. Considering Circular No.183, which required obtaining a certificate from the supplier, the Court acknowledged that the petitioner eventually obtained the certificate, albeit belatedly. - The High Court, considering the submissions and evidence presented, set aside the impugned order and directed the respondent to provide the petitioner with a fair opportunity to address the tax demand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.